RE-PRINT from Mazenglish blog - 2012
As the school year winds down, and I take a break from to the task of teaching and molding teenagers - especially boys - I am thinking about books that are great reads for and about teenage boys. Teaching honors English for freshman, I always begin the year with John Knowles A Separate Peace, followed immediately by William Golding's Lord of the Flies. These classics always generate engaging discussions - if not always stimulating teen boys for reading. The adolescent boy is a fascinating creature, and they are always worthy of research and study. And, from all we know, it's amazing the human race has survived considering all the great men of the world had to be adolescent boys at some point.
The following is a list of great books about the adolescent male - the "teenage boy." They are not always preferred by teen boys, but they are great reflections of that creature and subculture.
Contemporary Fiction
Carter Finally Gets It - Brent Crawford
Paper Towns - John Green
Will Grayson, Will Grayson - John Green (OK really anything by JG)
The Perks of Being a Wallflower - Stephen Chbosky
Spanking Shakespeare - Jake Wizner
King Dork - Frank Portman
Like We Care - Tom Matthews
Twisted - Laurie Halse Anderson
Stotan - Cris Crutcher (and anything else by Crutcher)
Vision Quest - Terry Davis
Swim the Fly - Don Calame
The Last Algonquin - Theodore Kazimeroff
Education of Little Tree - Forrest Carter
Classic Literature
A Separate Peace - John Knowles
The Catcher in the Rye - J.D. Salinger
Lord of the Flies - William Golding
Johnny Got His Gun - Dalton Trumbo
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn - Mark Twain
The Adventures of Tom Sawyer - Mark Twain
"Creating People On Whom Nothing is Lost" - An educator and writer in Colorado offers insight and perspective on education, parenting, politics, pop culture, and contemporary American life. Disclaimer - The views expressed on this site are my own and do not represent the views of my employer.
Tuesday, May 31, 2016
Monday, May 23, 2016
Food Network Star Returns
And Bobby and Giada are back ... with another group of amateurs who are going to annoy us until one of them is named the next Food Network Star .... and then go on to not have a show or be put in a really crappy time slot with some contrived idea. Seriously. Is anyone interested in watching Season 11 winner Eddie and his show about a kids BBQ competition? And, how 'bout the fabulous offerings from that Food Network Star Lenny McNab. Clearly, that season was a complete and total waste of time, not to mention incredibly poor judgment and vetting on the part of the Food Network execs. How did they not see that disaster coming? It was clear he was crass and unsophisticated to begin with. And, we're all still waiting for Chef Lucca's show, too.
Actually, we're not. I'm much more into HGTV these days. Property Bros or Caribbean Living, anyone?
But, I have been a pretty loyal fan of the Food Network Star idea, and I was interested enough to tune in for part of episode one, including the Star Salvation episode right before.. And, for a brief moment, I was pretty excited because I thought a true Food Network Star, Michelle Ragussis, was going to get another shot. Michelle was clearly the most talented and camera-ready contestant to ever lose out on the show. Nikkie Dinky is a close second. Yet, for mystifying reasons Tyler Florence and Valerie Bertinelli ( ... really?) chose to send Martita back for another shot. Sorry, Michelle. There is clearly some inexplicable bias against you.
So, this seasone we are offered ... really, nothing. My gut tells me from day one that the only real potential stars are the Italian guy, Damiano Carrera, and southerner Joy Thompson. The others are almost too painful to watch. But I will probably check in from time to time to see how they are all doing.
What do you think of the show and this year's crew?
Actually, we're not. I'm much more into HGTV these days. Property Bros or Caribbean Living, anyone?
But, I have been a pretty loyal fan of the Food Network Star idea, and I was interested enough to tune in for part of episode one, including the Star Salvation episode right before.. And, for a brief moment, I was pretty excited because I thought a true Food Network Star, Michelle Ragussis, was going to get another shot. Michelle was clearly the most talented and camera-ready contestant to ever lose out on the show. Nikkie Dinky is a close second. Yet, for mystifying reasons Tyler Florence and Valerie Bertinelli ( ... really?) chose to send Martita back for another shot. Sorry, Michelle. There is clearly some inexplicable bias against you.
So, this seasone we are offered ... really, nothing. My gut tells me from day one that the only real potential stars are the Italian guy, Damiano Carrera, and southerner Joy Thompson. The others are almost too painful to watch. But I will probably check in from time to time to see how they are all doing.
What do you think of the show and this year's crew?
Literacy Skills & Rigor
Re-post: Mazenglish, January 2013
What should high school students read? And what should high school teachers teach?
What should high school students read? And what should high school teachers teach?
The struggle in high school classrooms is vast. Teachers face the challenges of offering students a rigorous curriculum that will prepare them for college and life and developing basic literacy skills by engaging them with material they can handle. However, it doesn't have to be an either or decision.
Two great instructional texts for teachers to craft their English classroom model are Carol Jago's Classics in the Classroom and Denver-area teacher Cris Tovani's I Read It But I Don't Get It. Both women are renowned English teachers who have decades of experience promoting literacy and refining the best practices for the English classroom.
Sunday, May 22, 2016
Allusions - What Students Need to Know
Re-post: Mazenglish - August, 2012
All literature draws from the record of stories and events that has preceded it. English and American literature primarily draws inspiration from the stories of Western civilization, grounded in the the Judeo-Christian ethic, as well as Greek and Roman history. Thus, the challenge for many readers - and students in the high school classroom - is accessing the texts with enough prior knowledge to recognize the allusions and "get the point." As an English teacher, I often tell my students they need to be on their way to becoming - in the words of Henry James - people "on whom nothing is lost."
In the past few years, my colleagues and I have discussed the challenges of engaging students in classic literature when there is so much that is no longer common knowledge. At the AP level especially, teachers speak at conferences about how much students need to know - and the disconnect from their actual store of knowledge. To that end, we began compiling a list of allusions and references that students may encounter and might need to know. Certainly, the lists of "cultural knowledge" the E.D Hirsch has assembled for his book Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know is a foundation and the gold standard. In fact, it forms the curriculum of many schools that adopt the Core Knowledge movement. For others, a more abbreviated list is perhaps more practical.
To that end, I developed a list of common cultural allusions, and we have made it a part of the English handbook. The abbreviated list has background info, and it is divided into sections on:
Biblical allusions
Greek and Roman myths
Anglo-Saxon myths
Major historical events
Pop culture references
All literature draws from the record of stories and events that has preceded it. English and American literature primarily draws inspiration from the stories of Western civilization, grounded in the the Judeo-Christian ethic, as well as Greek and Roman history. Thus, the challenge for many readers - and students in the high school classroom - is accessing the texts with enough prior knowledge to recognize the allusions and "get the point." As an English teacher, I often tell my students they need to be on their way to becoming - in the words of Henry James - people "on whom nothing is lost."
In the past few years, my colleagues and I have discussed the challenges of engaging students in classic literature when there is so much that is no longer common knowledge. At the AP level especially, teachers speak at conferences about how much students need to know - and the disconnect from their actual store of knowledge. To that end, we began compiling a list of allusions and references that students may encounter and might need to know. Certainly, the lists of "cultural knowledge" the E.D Hirsch has assembled for his book Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know is a foundation and the gold standard. In fact, it forms the curriculum of many schools that adopt the Core Knowledge movement. For others, a more abbreviated list is perhaps more practical.
To that end, I developed a list of common cultural allusions, and we have made it a part of the English handbook. The abbreviated list has background info, and it is divided into sections on:
Biblical allusions
Greek and Roman myths
Anglo-Saxon myths
Major historical events
Pop culture references
Saturday, May 21, 2016
Cherry Creek Student Build a Tiny House
If you spend any time watching the immensely popuar House & Garden Network - HGTV - then you are aware of the tiny house movement. People across the country are taking "downsizing" to a whole new level with homes that are often no bigger than the size of a contemporary bathroom. Whether it's part of the de-clutter and simplify phase of a society that's reacting against decades of materialistic expansion, or if it's just an economic necessity to purchase a smaller abode in a country where property values have once again gone north of sanity, the interest in tiny houses is real.
But where do these tiny houses come from, and is there anything students can learn from the movement? Those are the questions being asked and answered by a group of students at Cherry Creek High School. Kids of Jeff Boyce's Environmental Science class have been pursuing knowledge and experience while designing and building a tiny house over the past year. Here's some coverage of their efforts:
But where do these tiny houses come from, and is there anything students can learn from the movement? Those are the questions being asked and answered by a group of students at Cherry Creek High School. Kids of Jeff Boyce's Environmental Science class have been pursuing knowledge and experience while designing and building a tiny house over the past year. Here's some coverage of their efforts:
A former contract environmental scientist with the Environmental Protection Agency, Boyce said the tiny house provides valuable insights into sustainable building practices. The house is being outfitted for solar panels. Boyce said that once students help put them in place, they will be linked to a computer system that will display how much power the panels are generating, how much the house is using, and how much power is required to do normal everyday things like charge a smart phone or laptop, among other things.
"It's a teaching tool that I can use to talk to kids about energy efficiency, resource consumption, conservation and their practices at home," Boyce said. The work students put in also has provided hands-on experience that could be valuable in a variety of jobs, Boyce said, including fields that are in high demand right now like renewable energy. "The STEM application — really making science real — that's what the tiny house is all about," Boyce said. "That's what my environmental sciences curriculum is all about. It's providing a foundation so kids can do more than work at the jobs they are doing right now."
Students who took part in the tiny house project sacrificed hours on the weekends to participate. Several of them said they were surprised by just how much they learned through workshop sessions where they watched construction professionals hang siding and perform other tasks before the students tackled them themselves.
Thursday, May 19, 2016
The Force Awakens Gen X Nostalgia
The Force Awakens Gen X Nostalgia
The opening text scrolled up the screen … and it was 1977 again.
By now, those of us in our forties who have seen JJ Abrams’ re-tread of George
Lucas’ classic space opera have settled into a comfortable pose of contented
reminiscence, as we reflect on the most important movie of our youth. Yes, of
course, as too many critics have been quick to point out, we’ve been here before. There is no doubting the striking
similarities between the original film and Episode VII, with Rey almost
identically substituting for Luke in the early scenes, and the plotline of a
secret message carried by a droid making us nostalgically nod our heads or
cynically roll our eyes in recognition and reminiscence. But it was almost as
fun the second time around. A true Gen Xer can enjoy the movie for all the praise it gets while also
acknowledging the validity of every criticism of Abrams. Yet, we get it – you
have to go back to go forward. Screenwriter Blake Snyder pointed out that
Hollywood studios and filmgoers simply want “the same thing, only different.”
That is the art of allusion and archetype which grounds all fiction and continually
enthralls audiences with the same basic stories re-told with different
costumes, settings, and characters. And, considering the original Star Wars: A New Hope drew heavily from
the mono-myth first explained by Joseph
Campbell, it’s only
appropriate that Star Wars: The Force
Awakens pay homage to the archetypes. At this point in our lives, Generation
X is ready to look back and live it all again, maybe a bit jaded, but hopefully with some
wisdom.
In framing the story of Rey and her almost mystical
connection to The Force, Abrams doesn’t dodge the obvious connections to the
past. Instead, he writes the redux directly into the film, referencing it when
Maz Kanata tells Rey, “I’ve lived long enough to see the same eyes in different
people. I know your eyes.” Clearly, Maz is dropping hints about Rey’s true identity, but Abrams is drawing on a larger
truth about stories and the human condition. Students of literature and film
know that there only seven basic stories anyway. And, as the children of
Generation X move into adolescence, and as the political and cultural landscape
reflects a stagnation reminiscent of the 70s and 80s, the return of a familiar
epic hero seems eerily appropriate. Is it really that surprising that the Star
Wars myth is returning at the exact same time Sylvester Stallone is back to the
original Rocky story? Most Gen Xers are now heading into the midst of the U-curve of emotional growth, and it’s at this point that life seems
to bottom out only to suddenly start getting cool again because we are now
looking at the world with a bit of hard-won wisdom. We know stuff. The year of
1977 brought the release of Star Wars, but it also saw the rise of punk rock
and all its rebellious spirit which no doubt influenced young Gen Xers. As disaffected a generation as Gen X was
supposed to be, the idea of nostalgia would almost seem unfathomable. In Star
Wars terms, Gen Xers were much more like Luke Skywalker who couldn’t wait to
get away from home than they are like Rey who wants nothing more than to get
back home. Yet, strangely, Generation X is every bit as retro as their initial
hipness foresaw, and the return of Star Wars is a reminder of the magic their
entertainment represented to their coming-of-age. The nostalgia boom is big for Gen Xers, and it’s with no shame that
forty-somethings are looking back fondly upon a past that really wasn’t much to
speak of when they were in it.
So, what to make of the nostalgic feelings about a story that
seems so familiar but contains enough subtle twists to be “the same thing, only
different.” Certainly, the villain of The
Force Awakens is a bit of a departure, or perhaps a development in the Lucas
legend. Kylo Ren – a child of divorce and the emotionally-frazzled product of a
dysfunctional home – is not the cold and calculating automaton that intimidated
us as Darth Vadar, but instead a brash young bully, prone to Millenial-esque emotional
swings and moments of self-doubt. Clearly, the moment of patricide – an ironic
reversal of the “Luke, I am your father” scene from the original – was a
clever bit of re-branding. And, Gen Xers get it. Of course, Han Solo had to die
just like Obi Wan did. That was our first acknowledgment of the archetypal
coming of age – the loss of a mentor figure. Generation X was a group defined
by loss and harsh realizations, especially about institutions and authority
figures. Luke would ultimately be abandoned by the only father figure he knew –
for that was how Xers grew up. As Gen X writer, Chuck Klosterman noted in his
essay “Lisa Loeb on Planet Hoth,” Empire Strikes
Back is really the most Gen X of movies – it’s the darkest of films
grounded in disappointment and frustration, the good guys losing, and the
deepening sense that it’s never going to get better. Ultimately, Empire and the whole trilogy reflected
Cold War and recession realities that left a generation jaded, but stronger and
wiser for it. That wisdom, wrapped up in myth and legend, is why Star Wars nostalgia resonates with Xers.
Yet, there are also unexplained and underdeveloped plot
twists in The Force Awakens that give
an original fan pause, seeking to understand those meta-moments and glossed
over plot points. A significant difference and development is the new weapon
that wipes out numerous planets in The Republic for whom the audience has no real
emotional connection other than passing reference to The Republic. In Star Wars: a New Hope, it was Leia’s
home planet of Alderaan that was at risk, and as the vulnerable and
recognizable humanity served as the example of the Empire’s power and sheer ruthlessness,
the chilling effect was pervasive. But in The
Force Awakens, the massive weapon is just a cool special effect for many
younger viewers who won’t take time to consider the significance of The
Republic. Has an era of drone strikes and a
never-ending War on Terror so desensitized society that the political
ramifications of mass destruction are reduced to big impressive fireworks? Some
deep humanist reflection is missing in a movie that so blandly glosses over the
annihilation of millions. From that point, Star
Wars: the Force Awakens veers into meta-fiction during the déjà vu discussion of attacking the new
“Death Star,” which for older audiences had to happen, but also weakens the
overall story. Do we really need Jedi fighters seemingly aware that they’re in
a movie, repeating lines from nearly four decades ago? It seemed a self-serving
conceit from a slightly embarrassed director, rather than an insightful bit of
self-aware satire. Meta-fiction in Star Wars seems eerily out of place, as
amusing as it is. Gen Xers were the first audience to truly appreciate
meta-fiction, but its use in Star Wars is somewhat pathetically patronizing.
Thus, the question for Gen X viewers is whether we appreciate
JJ Abrams’ paying homage to the original epic, or whether we are pissed off at
the way he hacks off the foundation of the franchise. As Generation X sits in
the heart of middle age, with the youngest at 35 and the bulk of us taking our
pre-teens and middle schoolers to the movie, The Force Awakens is a perfect moment of “Where Are We Now.” The
original news that Disney had purchased the franchise sent shivers of artistic malpractice
through many Gen Xers. For a group raised on punk rock, and for artists and
fans instrumental in the rise of alternative music and independent film, the
Disney-fication of our most sacred bit of pop culture seemed a gut-wrenching
sell-out. Yet, as our kids’ eyes lit up with the hype of the first trailer, and
we couldn’t help but smile at the appearance of Han and Chewy, the nostalgia
won us over. Despite the cynicism of a jaded generation, Generation X was ready
to reflect fondly on its past. Gen X is, no doubt, a strangely sentimental
group that has been in some ways nostalgic for the past almost from the moment
they entered adulthood. Perhaps no group ever graduated college as ready for
retirement as the group of Xers in Noah Baumbach’s Kicking and Screaming who lamented, “I’m nostalgic for five minutes
ago.” It wasn’t as much about slacking as it was about weariness. And now, as
those nostalgic kickers and screamers enter
middle age, the
return of our oldest mythology revives the wisdom of our pop culture mythology.
If there were ever a time for Generation X to begin looking
back, then 2016 is the moment. This year represents the quarter-century mark
for much of the entertainment that marked the post-Boomers as Generation X –
notably, Douglas Coupland’s Generation X:
Tales for an Accelerated Culture, Richard Linklater’s Slacker, and Nirvana’s Nevermind.
But if the seminal works of the 90s consciousness are representative of Gen X
identity, then the iconic films of the late 70s and early 80s like Stars Wars
and Empire Strikes Back were the foundation. With the return this year of both The Muppets and
The X-Files, Gen Xers can embrace the satirical whimsy of childhood in Kermit
and Piggy’s innocently dysfunctional romance, while also wallowing in the jaded
cynicism of Mulder’s return to smoking out government conspiracy. Certainly,
the darker side of reflection would seem to be the default of Xers, as New York
Times critic A.O. Scott has explained as the midlife crisis of Generation X.
And, recent works such Ben Stiller’s While
We Were Young and the Secret Life of
Walter Mitty, Judd Apatow’s This Is
40, and Noah Baumbauch’s Greenberg
have almost too often reflected the generational ennui that never really left
Gen Xers after their youth that was, in the words of Allison in Breakfast Club, “unsatisfying.” Thus,
for a generation that has often felt like reality never stopped biting, the
return of our original rebel alliance, framed so poignantly in that final
encounter between Ray and Luke Skywalker, is righteous cause for the cautious
nostalgia the Force has awakened.
Wednesday, May 18, 2016
DJ's Make Millions? Calvin Harris Tops the List
This weekend my high school held prom at a cool venue in Denver, and the DJ for the evening was a sophomore at our school. It was impressive, as he had hundreds of kids on the dance for hours, and they all had a blast. Over the years, we've hired DJs for our dances, and I've never given much thought to people who do this for a living. But I've taken notice recently after learning that the world's top DJs can make tens of millions of dollars a year. Who knew?
That sort of money simply baffles me - though I am just beginning to understand how the world of EDM - Electronic Dance Music - can be so lucrative. Entertainment has come a long way since the days of traveling minstrel shows, and there is no doubting the revenue involved in EDM. So, the next time a student is talking about his interest in DJ-ing, I will look more favorably. Though I am not entirely sure of when the DJ is writing and composing (or creating music) and when he is simply mixing and playing the music. This is a world that I'd like to learn more about. I'm thinking I might learn something from a new drama about the EDM world - We Are Your Friends. I'm not sure how authentic it is, but the film looks intriguing.
Cole Carter (Zac Efron) is a former track star and struggling 23-year-old DJ in the electronic dance music (EDM) scene, dreams of becoming a major record producer. He constantly reminds himself of his plan to rise to the top consists of three things: a laptop, some talent, and one track. Cole lives with his friend, Mason (Jonny Weston), and they would usually hang out along with their friends, Ollie (Shiloh Fernandez) and Squirrel (Alex Shaffer), around their native San Fernando Valley. With Mason's help and his friends heavily promoting at college campuses, Cole finally books a gig to DJ at a local nightclub, where he meets the headliner, a once-innovative DJ, James Reed
It’s been a year to remember for Calvin Harris. Over the past twelve months, the Scottish DJ earned $66 million, dropped an album that rocketed to the top of the U.S. dance charts and started dating Taylor Swift, in the process dethroning Jay Z and Beyoncé as music’s top-earning couple. The fact that he’s the world’s top-earning EDM act—tying the record for annual earnings by a DJ, which he set last year—is almost a footnote. Harris HRS -0.01% is once again the top name on our Electronic Cash Kings list, nearly doubling the total of second-rankedDavid Guetta, who pulled in $37 million. Not bad for a guy who’s roughly a decade removed from being a supermarket stockboy in a remote town in Scotland.“The rise of dance music has been astronomical … I happened to be in the right place at the right time,” he told FORBES.
That sort of money simply baffles me - though I am just beginning to understand how the world of EDM - Electronic Dance Music - can be so lucrative. Entertainment has come a long way since the days of traveling minstrel shows, and there is no doubting the revenue involved in EDM. So, the next time a student is talking about his interest in DJ-ing, I will look more favorably. Though I am not entirely sure of when the DJ is writing and composing (or creating music) and when he is simply mixing and playing the music. This is a world that I'd like to learn more about. I'm thinking I might learn something from a new drama about the EDM world - We Are Your Friends. I'm not sure how authentic it is, but the film looks intriguing.
Cole Carter (Zac Efron) is a former track star and struggling 23-year-old DJ in the electronic dance music (EDM) scene, dreams of becoming a major record producer. He constantly reminds himself of his plan to rise to the top consists of three things: a laptop, some talent, and one track. Cole lives with his friend, Mason (Jonny Weston), and they would usually hang out along with their friends, Ollie (Shiloh Fernandez) and Squirrel (Alex Shaffer), around their native San Fernando Valley. With Mason's help and his friends heavily promoting at college campuses, Cole finally books a gig to DJ at a local nightclub, where he meets the headliner, a once-innovative DJ, James Reed
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Edward Wan of Washington is the National "Math Bee" Champion for 2016
Math Counts.
In this STEM-focused era when schools, companies, and legislators are falling all over themselves to promote the study of science, technology, engineering, and math, it's truly surprising that more people are not aware of the national Math Bee known as MATHCOUNTS. The MATHCOUNTS competition is sponsored by the Raytheon Corporation and organized by a foundation of people including the National Society of Professional Engineers and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Like the national spelling bee, MATHCOUNTS is open to middle school students who compete in regional and state tournaments for the chance to compete at the national level.
The competitors known as "mathletes" compete in individual and team written rounds with the goal of "making the stage" for the lightening fast Countdown Round, where the top mathletes answer complex math questions on algebra, geometry, probability, and statistics, and they must solve them in forty-five seconds or less. The mad math skills of these kids is truly extraordinary, and the head-to-head matches are nothing short of breathtaking in their intensity.
Check out these highlights from the Countdown Round:
In this STEM-focused era when schools, companies, and legislators are falling all over themselves to promote the study of science, technology, engineering, and math, it's truly surprising that more people are not aware of the national Math Bee known as MATHCOUNTS. The MATHCOUNTS competition is sponsored by the Raytheon Corporation and organized by a foundation of people including the National Society of Professional Engineers and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Like the national spelling bee, MATHCOUNTS is open to middle school students who compete in regional and state tournaments for the chance to compete at the national level.
The competitors known as "mathletes" compete in individual and team written rounds with the goal of "making the stage" for the lightening fast Countdown Round, where the top mathletes answer complex math questions on algebra, geometry, probability, and statistics, and they must solve them in forty-five seconds or less. The mad math skills of these kids is truly extraordinary, and the head-to-head matches are nothing short of breathtaking in their intensity.
Check out these highlights from the Countdown Round:
This year's competition was held at the Renassiance Hotel in Washington DC, and the last two mathletes standing were eighth grader Edward Wan of Washington and Luke Robitaille of Texas. The Texas team was truly dominant this year, winning the team competition and sending all four of its mathletes to the 12-person countdown - a feat which has never happened. Texas also feature two sixth graders in countdown, which has also never happened. The countdown round was featured on ESPN3 on Monday, May 9 during the mid-day. It's nice for ESPN to offer the coverage - but it's a bit of a shame that ESPN offers three hours of prime-time air to the national spelling bee. While we shouldn't take anything away from the achievements of the nation's top spellers, there is really no comparison to the incredible math skills of the nation's top mathletes. Perhaps someday, the Department of Education and ESPN and Raytheon will give proper due to the kids of MATHCOUNTS.
Monday, May 16, 2016
6th Annual Cherry Creek Poetry Slam
The power of language is alive and well in the Cherry Creek School District of Colorado, and the young slam poets of the district's six high schools are making their voices heard. Slam poet Jovan Mays is a key force behind the growing slam community in the southeast Denver school district. As a former national slam competitor and as the Poet Laureate of Aurora, Jovan inspires all kids to embrace the spoken word as a platform for their thoughts. Here's a link to the story I wrote on the Cherry Creek School District's 6th Annual Poetry Slam.
“The point is not the points – the point is the poem.” That artistic wisdom was laid down by slam poet Jovan Mays two weeks ago at the Sixth Annual Cherry Creek School District Poetry Slam. Mays, who is a district alum and the Poet Laureate of Aurora, emceed the event as twenty-four high school poets took the stage at Eaglecrest High School on April 14 to throw down verbal gymnastics in their bid for the district championship.
This year’s slam host was Ashley McCulloch, an English teacher and debate coach, who coordinated the event with students from Eaglecrest and other district high schools. For the first time, the Cherry Creek Slam featured poets from all six high schools. Jovan explained how “This district slam began six years ago after I competed at the National Poetry Slam, and I just knew I had to bring this art form back to students in my community.” He has worked tirelessly during the past decade or so to workshop with students and teachers, promoting the power of language and the freeing power of poetry. “This art form saved me in high school,” Jovan has noted, and he is committed to opening the medium to as many kids as possible.
Wednesday, May 11, 2016
Cherry Creek High School's Troubadours Play Carnegie Hall
One of the great joys of working at a place like Cherry Creek High School is getting to experience the incredible artistic talents of groups like the Troubadours. Creek's men's audition a cappella choir is a group of hardworking and musically gifted young men who bring sheer joy to their art. Last month, I had the special opportunity to travel to New York City where the group participated in a musical showcase at Carnegie Hall. It was a once-in-a-lifetime experience for many. Here's some info from the story I wrote for the Denver Post - Cherry Creek's Troubadours Take Manhattan:
Everyone knows the old adage about the way to get to Carnegie Hall – “practice, practice, practice.” No one has to tell that to the Cherry Creek High School Troubadours, as the men’s a cappella choir practices extensively, working daily in class and putting on numerous concerts throughout the year. Their hard work was recently rewarded when they achieved the dream of so many aspiring musicians, playing Carnegie Hall on a recent trip to New York City.
Cherry Creek’s audition choir The Troubadours travelled to the Big Apple in late March to participate in a Saturday evening event where eleven high school choirs from around the country came together for three days of rehearsal to prepare a musical program that was performed at Carnegie Hall. Cherry Creek choir leader and director Sarah Harrison was contacted by travel company Manhattan Concert Productions which organizes events such as the Carnegie Hall concert, and the Troubadours were invited to join the production. She has worked with the organization numerous times because she can “trust this company to put together a quality product.”
Sunday, May 1, 2016
Teresa Keegan Demeans Non-College-Educated Workers to Promote Standardized Testing in Denver Post
Standardized testing - what could be wrong?
The role of standardized testing in public education continues to complicate discussions about students and learning and achievement. A major problem is people who look so superficially at the idea of education and assessment that they can't begin to fathom what could be wrong and why some parents and teachers criticize testing and "opt out." The latest argument published by the Denver Post comes from Teresa Keegan who overimplifies the issue, complicates her own argument with conflicting information, and succeeds in demeaning and insulting 7 in 10 adults who work in fields that don't rely on academic skills. Here's her piece titled: Fourteen Centuries of Standardized Testing Can't be Wrong.
Here's my response to her:
The role of standardized testing in public education continues to complicate discussions about students and learning and achievement. A major problem is people who look so superficially at the idea of education and assessment that they can't begin to fathom what could be wrong and why some parents and teachers criticize testing and "opt out." The latest argument published by the Denver Post comes from Teresa Keegan who overimplifies the issue, complicates her own argument with conflicting information, and succeeds in demeaning and insulting 7 in 10 adults who work in fields that don't rely on academic skills. Here's her piece titled: Fourteen Centuries of Standardized Testing Can't be Wrong.
But what happens when these untested kids grow up? Those who wish to become lawyers are not going to be able to "opt out" of the grueling two-day bar exam. Anyone who wants to enter the lucrative accounting field must take the four-part, 14-hour CPA exam. Will these people even be able to pass a driving test? Of course, there is one surefire way to avoid the stress that comes with qualifying for grown-up professional jobs. There are currently no testing or licensure requirements to be a retail sales associate at Walmart.
Ms. Keegan,
While I generally enjoy and agree with your pieces for the Post, I am quite disappointed in the naive and myopic view of testing you take in your most recent piece. It is an example of the general public who have scant knowledge of education, pedagogy, assessment, and learning. While you start off on the right foot with your connection to the problems of Confucian era testing, you veer off at the end into a superficial generalization at the end which implies that since someday some kids will need to take tests for a job, then all standardized testing is simply practice for that future and thus beneficial. This generalization overlooks genuine questions about our goals and endpoints of education. A future civil servant or accountant is making a choice to enter that field. And your comparison to a driver's test is petty and misguided.
A key positive of your piece is noting that these tests (PARCC, ACT, etc.) assess only academic skills which represent only a snapshot of how kids "test," but nothing more. However, I was quite shocked at the end when you pretentiously and rather curtly dismiss the value of anyone who does not pursue academic skills and bachelor degrees and white collar work. By demeaning people who work in retail and skilled labor, you have exposed a flaw in your argument and the problems of the "college-for-all" mentality. Shame on you, Ms. Keegan. Do you not know that only 3 in 10 Americans have a four-year degree and work in a field that requires one? If you - and other pro-PARCC voices - succeed in preparing 100% of students for four-year degree and promise them white collar "academic" careers, who will work in the service industry, repair your cars and plumbing, build houses and office buildings, take out the garbage, clean the offices, stock the grocery shelves, etc, etc., etc.? Yes, some engineer will create an iPhone, and some marketing exec will commercialize it. But that product is worthless without the hundreds of thousands of workers who assemble the phone, sell the phone, and service the phone (not to mention the whole related infrastructure). Have you given much thought to the "non-academic" role played by the truck drivers who deliver all the products on which you depend for your job and your writing hobby? Your ignorance of the roles all workers play in a dynamic economy lacks the precise sort of "critical thinking" that we desperately try to teach kids ... and which is rarely "assessed" by companies like Pearson.
Additionally, the "opt out movement" does not support the elimination of all tests. They are for scrutiny of who is being tested, what is being tested, how much they/it is being tested, and, most importantly, what is being done with the data. They are critical of the quality of the tests and the "quality control" in determining which assessments we use. Do you have any expertise in math and language arts assessment? Is the PARCC an accurate test of skills? Is it norm or criterion referenced? Have the proficiency cut points been piloted and cross referenced? How can different states have different cut points for PARCC proficiency? How can PARCC honestly declare that "ZERO percent" of high school students in Illinois are advanced"? Knowing many top national schools and students in Illinois, I know for certain that "data" like this exposes serious flaws in the system, and those flaws are not only deserving of far more scrutiny than you would pursue, but they also demand a refusal to submit to the test until the validity of the measures are determined.
Have you given any thought to these concerns and issues? Assessment has a role - and so does careful scrutiny of the tests and the process. As a parent and a teacher and a school administrator, I think carefully about these issues on a daily basis. I write extensively on the issue, and I've testified before the State Board of Education and the Senate Education Committee. And, I am troubled by people superficially commenting on serious educational issues.
I would be happy to discuss the issue of standardized tests and assessment policy with you further if you have any interest in learning more about the issue. Let's chat before you decide to publish another piece on testing.
Regards,
Michael Mazenko
A Teacher's View
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)