The Colorado Dept of Education's careless and unprofessional announcement of a switch for the state mandated test for juniors was ill-timed and rather shocking. When the state began to backpedal, it was obvious they'd been caught, admittedly not doing "what's best for kids." So whose interest is CDE - or the mysterious "selection committee - serving with this decision.
The shift is not
simply a matter of choosing between equal tests. The SAT is implementing an
entirely new format and style for which there has been no piloting, meaning the
data from this assessment will be completely raw. There is no context for these
scores and no legitimate comparability for cut scores. Asking high school
juniors to take this test and allow it to become part of their permanent record
is truly an egregious disregard for the best interests of kids. And, I am
shocked at the wanton disregard with which CDE has acted in this case. Just as
CDE did with PARCC, the state is asking our students to serve as guinea pigs
for an "un-proven test."
Additionally, I am too
well informed to not be suspicious of ulterior motives regarding the decision.
It is no secret that there is strong sentiment in Colorado for withdrawal from
PARCC. In fact, not two weeks before this decision, both Elliott Asp and Steve
Durham were quoted in Chalkbeat as implying that this spring would be the last
year for PARCC. Had the state chosen to remain with ACT for juniors, it would
have been a very easy shift to ACT-Aspire for grades 3-9. And, it's no secret
that many districts are strongly in favor of ACT-Aspire.
Now, with a shift to
PSAT and SAT, the State Board faces a much more difficult decision in
withdrawing from PARCC because it makes little sense to switch to Aspire for
3-8 or another test and then use PSAT/SAT at the high school. And, those of us
who are paying attention have not forgotten that one of the strongest and most
persistent proponents of PARCC is College Board President David Coleman.
Obviously, College Board and some at CDE seek to establish a link between PARCC
tests at grades 3-9 and PSAT/SAT at high school. Losing Colorado would have
been a serious blow to PARCC, but with the recent decisions in Colorado and
Illinois to leave ACT and sign with SAT, PARCC's status is strengthened. This
seems to be an intentional move by CDE to force the State Board's hand
regarding PARCC. Clearly, CDE appears to be acquiescing to the will of DavidColeman and College Board, as opposed to the desires of the people of Colorado.
The entire issue is
suspicious and deserves great scrutiny by the parents and educators in
Colorado. The news of the "selection committee" was a surprise to
many who have followed this discussion for years, and the ambiguity of the
identity of committee members is questionable as well. Like all the previous
work done with HB1323, any committee tasked with making this monumental
decision should have been conducted with great transparency. CDE has failed the
people of Colorado on all accounts regarding this decision.
No comments:
Post a Comment