In this interesting bit of commentary from a retired teacher, Frank Breslin makes a case for "Why America Demonizes Its Teachers," and he offers plenty of information for why students struggle and why some schools are still "failing." Additionally, he notes certain areas in which it can be argued schools and public education are still underfunded.
The issue of teacher responsibility for student performance must be
placed within this broader social context of what has been happening
outside the American classroom for the last 30 years. Only in this way
will the discussion about student learning become more realistic, and
honest, and why singling out teachers alone distorts the true nature of
both the problem and its solution. When there are too few teachers in a school, and those few are
overwhelmed by large classes and have no time to provide individualized
attention for students -- many of whom come to school deeply troubled
and alienated with all sorts of problems having nothing to do with the
school -- is it any wonder that students find it hard to focus and
learn? The emotional, familial, and social problems of many
inner-city students are often so deeply embedded and, in many cases,
treatable only by professional help that the paltry resources of the
school cannot begin to address them. These underfunded schools often
lack even the essential services of counselors, social workers, and
nurses because of draconian budget cuts. What makes matters
still worse is that these same schools are now set up for additional
failure by being annually denied billions in vitally needed tax revenues
diverted to charter schools, with no accountability, as part of a
right-wing political agenda.
When I posted the column to Facebook, I did receive one comment which criticized the article for the standard response from "the Left" that it's always about needing more money. While I do concede that the calls for more education funding can be redundant, the issue is certainly more complex. More money will not fix countless problems in schools, and more money poorly spent will do nothing for students in need. Yet, there is plenty of data that supports the idea of more funding leading to better educational outcomes. This is especially true in the areas of graduation rates - but not always so clear with standardized test scores. Increased funding does have long term positive effects on success later in life, especially when tracking adult incomes.
Our findings provide compelling evidence that money does matter, and
that additional school resources can meaningfully improve long-run
outcomes for students. Specifically, we find that increased spending
induced by SFRs positively affects educational attainment and economic
outcomes for low-income children. While we find only small effects for
children from nonpoor families, for low-income children, a 10 percent
increase in per-pupil spending each year for all 12 years of public
school is associated with roughly 0.5 additional years of completed
education, 9.6 percent higher wages, and a 6.1-percentage-point
reduction in the annual incidence of adult poverty.
And, to my point from earlier posts that Bill Gates should focus on fixing "a school," with his billions, rather than "fixing schools" with across the board reforms like Common Core. If we targeted spending on support systems like child care in disadvantaged neighborhoods, we could "fix schools" one neighborhood at a time. That's what millionaire Harris Rosen did in the community of Tangelor Park, Florida.
Twenty-one years later, with an infusion of $11 million of Mr. Rosen’s
money so far, Tangelo Park is a striking success story. Nearly all its
seniors graduate from high school, and most go on to college on full
scholarships Mr. Rosen has financed.Young children head for kindergarten primed for learning, or already
reading, because of the free day care centers and a prekindergarten
program Mr. Rosen provides. Property values have climbed. Houses and
lawns, with few exceptions, are welcoming. Crime has plummeted.
Money invested in neighborhoods that need it will do far more to "fix schools" than any nationwide standards and curriculum movement or any state and federal education legislation.
So, reformers, buck up the money and "fix a school."
No comments:
Post a Comment